<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Netvibes.com &#8211; Online RSS reader.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.farhanfaisal.com/2007/05/netvibescom-online-rss-reader/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.farhanfaisal.com/2007/05/netvibescom-online-rss-reader/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=netvibescom-online-rss-reader</link>
	<description>Sys admin, rock climber and internet junky diary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:29:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Francis</title>
		<link>http://www.farhanfaisal.com/2007/05/netvibescom-online-rss-reader/comment-page-1/#comment-8026</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 06:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farhanfaisal.com/index.php/technology/netvibescom-online-rss-reader/#comment-8026</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using Reader for about 4 months now, and I&#039;ve been blown away by how much easier it is to use than just about any other option out there.

It&#039;s fast, easy to use and simple. Nothing quite comes close. Also it doesn&#039;t have the problems other aggregators have -- remember Bloglines and their Atom feed fiasco?

It really does embody what we&#039;ve come to expect from Google -- fast, simple, but (sadly) not all that good looking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using Reader for about 4 months now, and I&#8217;ve been blown away by how much easier it is to use than just about any other option out there.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s fast, easy to use and simple. Nothing quite comes close. Also it doesn&#8217;t have the problems other aggregators have &#8212; remember Bloglines and their Atom feed fiasco?</p>
<p>It really does embody what we&#8217;ve come to expect from Google &#8212; fast, simple, but (sadly) not all that good looking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

